ctrlspace
// The network backbone, and cameras that match it

UniFi (Ubiquiti)

Ubiquiti's UniFi line covers the networking a smart home depends on and, through Protect, a camera system that records locally to a console in your house. It is not cheap and it is the most coherent option at the top of the range.

Why we use UniFi (Ubiquiti)

  • The networking is the real product. Proper access points, VLANs to separate smart devices from your computers, and a controller that shows what is actually happening.
  • UniFi Protect records locally on the console, with no subscription and no cloud storage.
  • Excellent Home Assistant integration for both the network and Protect, including presence detection from Wi-Fi clients.
  • Cameras and network are managed in one place, which matters once a home has thirty devices.

Where we do not, and why

  • Expensive, particularly once a console and multiple cameras are in the plan.
  • Protect requires a UniFi console. Cameras will not record to a generic NVR.
  • Ubiquiti nudges hard towards a cloud account, and some remote features assume it.
  • Stock availability here has historically been erratic.

Pros and cons at a glance

Pros
  • Best-in-class prosumer networking, which a smart home genuinely needs
  • Protect records locally with no subscription
  • One interface for network and cameras
  • Outstanding Home Assistant integration
Cons
  • High cost of entry
  • Protect locks you to a UniFi console
  • Cloud account pressure
  • Patchy local stock

The technical position

Main protocol
IP over Ethernet and Wi-Fi
Local control
Yes, network and Protect both local
Vendor hub needed
A UniFi console for Protect
Home Assistant support
Excellent, for network and cameras
Singapore availability
Through distributors, availability varies
A boxed Ubiquiti UniFi ceiling access point and a bubble-wrapped UniFi Dream Router.
A UniFi access point and Dream Router before installation.
A ceiling-mounted UniFi wireless access point installed flush to the ceiling.
The same access point, cabled and mounted.

Where it fits in a CtrlSpace build

The networking goes into most landed projects and any condo where the existing router is the bottleneck. Protect follows where the client wants a single managed system; where budget is the constraint, Reolink cameras onto a local recorder do the same job for less.

// Frequently asked

UniFi (Ubiquiti), answered plainly

Do I need UniFi networking for a smart home?

Not necessarily, but the network is the most under-considered part of a smart home and the most common cause of one feeling unreliable. UniFi is our recommendation when the property is large or the existing router is clearly the limiting factor.

Does UniFi Protect need a subscription?

No. Recording is local to the console you own. A cloud account is offered for remote access and is not required for the system to work.
// 7 more in this category

See others in cameras and security

PoE · RTSP Reolink Local recording without a subscription PoE · ONVIF Hikvision Excellent optics, uncomfortable questions PoE · ONVIF Dahua Capable hardware, the same caveats as Hikvision Wi-Fi TP-Link Tapo & Kasa Cheap, convenient, and increasingly closed Cloud only Ring A subscription with a lens attached Cloud only Google Nest Good cameras, an unhappy history Cloud only Arlo Wire-free convenience, everything else is a subscription

Not sure what belongs in your home?

We do not sell hardware or carry brands. Bring your list to a design session and we will tell you what is worth buying, what you already own that can stay, and what to skip.

Book a design session See every brand